Five sites. The biblical connections. The fieldwork behind the discoveries.
ProverbsGuys supports Ron Wyatt’s research and believes it deserves a careful hearing. Explore the case for each site through photographs, reported findings, Scripture, and original accounts.
Read the findings alongside the researchers’ explanations. Each section identifies the evidence being presented and the interpretation connecting it to biblical history.
Links open the full passage on Bible Gateway.
Eastern Turkey · the mountains of Ararat
A boat-shaped formation, measurements, samples, and decades of survey work form the case for Durupınar. Ron’s investigations brought sustained attention to the site; modern researchers continue to examine what lies beneath it.
Full view of the Durupınar formation in eastern Turkey, with both ends visible. Image supplied by ProverbsGuys. Wyatt identified this formation as Noah’s Ark; that identification is disputed.
The formation’s reported length is about 515 feet (157 metres). Supporters compare this with 300 Egyptian royal cubits. That comparison depends on which cubit Genesis uses; the outline and length are starting points for the case, rather than a complete identification.
Wyatt described metal-detection patterns, radar surveys, and samples he interpreted as timber and fittings. His original book explains his measurements and his interpretation of the formation’s wider, splayed shape.
Noah’s Ark Scans reports geometric subsurface patterns and differences between soil inside and outside the formation. The team interprets these as reasons to investigate a buried structure. GPR and resistivity images indicate material contrasts; direct sampling helps determine what those contrasts represent.
The modern research team itself says its evidence is not yet definitive proof. Follow the project’s published results and distinguish the measured findings from the proposed Ark interpretation.
Jebel al-Lawz region · northwestern Saudi Arabia
The case for this location brings geography and several nearby features together. Ron searched east of the Gulf of Aqaba, connecting Moses’ time in Midian with the mountain to which he would bring Israel.
Visitors beside a panel of animal petroglyphs, included with the supplied Sinai research material.
Mary Nell’s account explains Ron’s reasoning from Exodus 3: Moses tended Jethro’s flock and encountered God at Horeb. Supporters connect this setting with northwestern Arabia and read Galatians 4:25 alongside it. These passages guide a regional search; they do not name a modern peak.
Ark Discovery presents a darkened summit, a large split rock, stone features interpreted as altars and pillars, and cattle petroglyphs. Supporters compare them with the fire on Sinai, water from the rock, covenant ceremony, and golden-calf episode.
The argument gains its force from the proposed relationship between mountain, campsite, water sources, and route. Study the photographs and locations together, rather than treating one rock or carving as the entire case.
The features can be photographed; connecting them to specific Exodus events requires dating and archaeological context. The Saudi Sinai identification remains debated.
Nuweiba, Egypt · Gulf of Aqaba
Ron’s proposed crossing connects the Nuweiba shoreline with a route toward Midian and the Saudi Sinai region. Geography and reported underwater finds are the two main strands of the argument.
A supplied collage of underwater forms associated with Red Sea crossing research. Identification of the forms is discussed in the discovery account above.
Supporters examine the beach and surrounding terrain against the account of Israel being trapped between the sea and Pharaoh’s army. The geographic proposal should be studied with the route and the biblical sequence of events.
Wyatt reported coral-covered objects he interpreted as chariot wheels and other remains. The supplied images show the forms associated with this research; proponents compare their shapes with Egyptian chariot components.
In the Wyatt family account, the Nuweiba crossing leads into the wider Exodus-route argument. A proposed crossing on the Gulf of Aqaba and a mountain in Arabia are presented as linked parts of the same reconstruction.
An underwater photograph records a form; its identification as an ancient chariot needs documented examination, dating, and provenance. The images here preserve the research material without assigning it an independently established age.
Dead Sea region · the proposed cities of the plain
Pale, crumbly formations and sulfur nodules are central to Ron’s case for the cities of the plain. His family account places the beginning of his close investigation in 1989.
Ron and his supporters identified wall-like outlines, right angles, and other shapes as remnants of destroyed buildings. The family account describes several proposed city locations, including the formations near Masada that Ron identified as Gomorrah.
Ark Discovery displays sulfur nodules, some enclosed within surrounding material, and reports high sulfur concentrations in tested samples. Supporters connect the material with the brimstone of Genesis 19. View the sample photographs and the reported analyses together.
Genesis describes fire and brimstone; 2 Peter refers to the cities being reduced to ashes. The supportive case connects those descriptions with the formations’ appearance and the embedded sulfur.
Sulfur composition, the origin of the surrounding material, and the identity of a city are separate questions. Establishing a city’s name and destruction history requires site context and dating as well as sample analysis.
Eastern Turkey · the wider Noah research area
Ron’s Noah research extended beyond the boat-shaped formation to pierced stones, a proposed homestead, and grave markers. This part of the story asks what traces might remain of the family’s life after the Flood.
Ron Wyatt beside one of the large carved stones he investigated in Turkey. Photograph identified by the Wyatt family archive as taken in 1977.
Ron interpreted the large pierced stones as anchors or drogue stones. He connected later cross carvings, including eight-cross groupings, with a Christian remembrance of the eight survivors. The crosses are later carvings, rather than inscriptions made by Noah.
In his original book, Wyatt described an old stone house and two nearby markers, which he interpreted as memorials of Noah and his wife. He also reported later damage to the house and markers. These details come from his account.
Supporters consider the stones, symbols, homestead account, and regional setting together. First Peter’s reference to eight people gives the biblical connection its focus.
The photograph shows a pierced stone. Its proposed use aboard the Ark, and the identities of the house’s occupants and graves, are interpretations that need their own supporting evidence.
Continue with ProverbsGuys interviews, documentaries, and firsthand memories.
